Ah, Valentine's Day. That means witless (and mediocre) romantic films all over the commercial TV channels, so nothing worthwhile for me to watch (apart from an episode of the Dutch series
"Wie is... de Mol?" on a non-commercial channel). I prefer to watch something that doesn't make my brain cells die an excruciating death, thank you very much.
But, let's talk about something more
positive interesting that is also slightly related to Valentine's Day. Thanks to
kiratollan, I have a renewed interest in the Romas 'ship. That is, the relationship between Rose DeWitt Bukater and Thomas Andrews from
"Titanic." A few years ago, at Shippers United or at
White Flag (I don't precisely remember which), Kira and I started talking about how much more right Thomas was for Rose than Jack ever was, which eventually resulted in a thread dedicated to the pairing and an "analysis" written by me (reproduced
here). Unfortunately, the 'ship was not very well-known in general and so there was little material (fanfiction, fan art, etc.) to keep the fire burning. Until recently, that is. Kira pointed me to new material: a few Romas-oriented music videos on YouTube. That proves that there are more Romas 'shippers out there, and with videos it is much easier to imagine a pairing - so that means that the videos will corrupt a fair number of people, heh heh. ;) I'm looking forward to seeing the fandom grow - maybe someday I can create a community for them, but for now I think the
thomas_andrews community will suffice. :)
Of all the music videos on YouTube, my personal favourite was
this one. Simply heart-breaking, gave me goose bumps all over. *wistful sigh* This one (
click here) is great also, and I also like
this tribute to Thomas Andrews. I realise these videos aren't top-notch - I've seen much better
music videos for the Buffy/Giles 'ship - but that's because there isn't much film material available for Thomas and for Thomas and Rose together. It's better than nothing, especially if you think about how small the fandom for Romas still is. :)
Hmm, I still have some old ideas for a Romas fic lying around somewhere - perhaps I will someday get around to writing a full-fledged fanfiction story. This reminds me that I also yet have to write one for Victoria/De Soto from
"Zorro", too. Because, you know, the greatest fun in supporting unconventional 'ships is that you - in the words of
Captain Picard - go where no one has ever gone before. I think it's great to explore uncharted territory, to be able to corrupt people to the 'ship and to set an example to them. :)
By the way, I have created
3 music videos in my roughly 9-year-long 'shipping career - which I have now uploaded to
MegaUpload.com. I had uploaded them to
YouTube once, but the automatic conversion to the .flv video format during the upload process damaged the quality of both picture and sound - so I felt that people couldn't watch the videos as they were meant to be watched. I kept them on YouTube anyway (until they were removed by YouTube staff for copyright infringement), because I didn't know where else to upload them. But fortunately, now there is MegaUpload.com, where one can temporarily (90 days) host big files for free - so I can once again make my videos available to the public. :)
For those
bored interested, more information about my videos can be found under the cut.
( Music video information right here. )Well, let's move on to non-'shipping matters now. :)
Last Tuesday (February 12th), I went to see
"Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber Of Fleet Street" at the Calypso in Nijmegen. For most people,
Johnny Depp is reason enough to want to watch the film - I mostly went to see it for
Alan Rickman. Too bad that Alan played a dirty old pervert in the film, but his portrayal of Judge Turpin was superb nonetheless. A very welcome, unexpected bonus to the film was that
Anthony Stewart Head had a cameo in it - I almost squealed out loud with delight in the cinema, tee hee! ;) Too bad Tony didn't get to sing, though! :(
For the rest, the musical was pretty good (I shan't talk about the plot, because I don't want to spoil anyone). I couldn't really hear the music of the songs in the cinema (it works better for me to watch this type of film with a headphone on), though I could hear the dialogue just fine. Definitely need to rewatch this film once it is out on DVD, so that I can get a really good impression of Johnny Depp's singing abilities. His Sweeney Todd was terrific - I really do hope he wins the Oscar for Best Actor at the 80th Academy Awards later this month. *crosses fingers*
While watching the film, did anyone also feel a bit like they had stepped into some sort of distorted
"Harry Potter" universe? I mean...
Helena Bonham Carter (
Bellatrix Lestrange),
Timothy Spall (
Peter Pettigrew), Alan Rickman (
Severus Snape)... I couldn't help but think of "HP" everytime I saw them.
Oh, and did
Sacha Baron Cohen's obvious bulge in his tight pants also distract anyone? I mean, it was unavoidable, impossible to ignore even if you very much wanted to. Normally, I wouldn't really complain, but I thought it was a bit icky because a) I never really liked Baron Cohen and b) the character he played was already icky enough on his own. Now, if it'd been Alan's or Tony's, I wouldn't even have gotten out of the cinema alive (I'd have choked on my own drool or died of cardiac arrest, heh heh heh). *dreamy sigh*
Anyway, late in the night of that same day (February 12th), I watched
"Buster" on BBC 1. Even though I'd heard that it was a mediocre film, I wanted to see it because I wanted to see the acting abilities of one of my favourite singers (
Phil Collins) and because it is the film for which Phil had covered
The Mindbenders' "A Groovy Kind Of Love" (Phil's version is my all-time favourite song). I'd also seen clips of "Buster" in the official music video for "A Groovy Kind Of Love", so naturally I was curious about the film.
It turned out to be a very nice film, actually. The plot wasn't too predictable, the film had some funny moments and the acting was good (although typically '80s at times). I thought Phil's acting was decent and believeable - but for me personally,
Julie Walters stole the show. A few years prior to "Buster," she had already given a terrific performance in
"Educating Rita", which is a film about an alcoholic university professor (
Michael Caine) who finds new purpose in his empty life when he starts to teach English Literature to a woman from the working class (Julie Walters) and eventually falls in love with her. And in "Buster", Walters once again gave a very good and enjoyable performance. I just love that woman - definitely one of my favourite actresses. :)
Alright, that's enough about films for now. :)
You probably didn't notice, but I've been away from the Internet for a couple of days. On Thursday (February 7th), I tried to format my main hard disk (I had two of them at the time, 30 GB each - the main one is the C-drive) but the setup programme wasn't able to complete the setup process because my hard disk was "probably damaged." The setup programme advised me to format and then install Windows XP on the other hard disk (the D-drive), which I couldn't do, because Windows is always best installed on the C-drive. After a few more attempts, my DVD-ROM drive didn't even want to read the Windows XP installation CD anymore and kept throwing it out, so that's when I gave up and decided to call a computer repairman. He came only yesterday afternoon, so I've been unable to do anything with my own computer before that time. Fortunately I went to my parents' in the weekend (my mother celebrated her 46th birthday on Friday, February 8th) and so I still had access to Internet. I stayed there until Monday, and I mostly did some cleaning up at my place in order to while away the time. I managed it just fine: computer withdrawal symptoms were limited to mere impatience and restlessness. ;)
This particular problem wasn't unfamiliar to me, by the way: it first occurred about half a year ago. Back then, my computer started to make this high-toned alarm while in the process of formatting and eventually it turned itself off without even having finished the formatting process. This had never happened to me before (previous attempts at formatting had always been successful and uneventful), and I didn't know what the hell that alarm was all about. Later, I found out that it was a warning signal for when the temperature in the computer gets too high (mine turns itself off when it has reached 80 °C).
After that happened, I couldn't properly format my hard disk anymore (I received the same error message that I had written about earlier) and so I brought it to a computer repairman (not the same one as yesterday's). He opened up my computer and removed all the dust in it, so that the temperature wouldn't get so high anymore. He solved the problem of the DVD-ROM drive throwing out the installation CD by disconnecting the drive of the burner. Once the burner was disconnected, the DVD-ROM drive obediently read the CD and the error message suddenly didn't appear anymore after the formatting process. Once the formatting process was completed and Windows XP was installed, one could connect the burner again and everything would function as it should. So that's how it was solved at the time.
In the time that followed after that visit to the computer repairman, my computer didn't make that alarm sound anymore for about six months; after that, it started again and then I had my
CPU fan replaced. Apart from that, I was able to successfully format my hard disk several times with the computer opened and the burner disconnected.
Last week, however, something had mysteriously changed and I was not able to get to the setup programme when the burner was disconnected. I found myself forced to try to format while both the DVD-ROM drive and the burner were connected at the same time. I knew it would probably fail, I knew I probably would get that error message again (which I did), but I had to try and see. When the formatting process failed and the DVD-ROM drive eventually refused to read the installation CD, I thought: "Alright, I'm going to get myself a new hard disk. I've always wanted a new one and since this one appears to be damaged, now is the time to do it."
So, when the computer repairman came yesterday, he removed the faulty one of my two 30 GB hard disks and replaced it with a 160 GB hard disk. So, I now have a C-drive of 160 GB and a D-drive of 30 GB, which is a total of 190 GB of space on my computer. That may seem very little compared to the standards of nowadays, but it's more than enough for me. I will never ever be able to fill that much space (I don't play games or do other things that take up a lot of space), so it's all I need.
The problem with the DVD-ROM drive and the burner remained, however - so the computer repairman got around it by making the burner the master and the DVD-ROM the slave (it was the other way around first). It's a temporary solution: I think I will need to replace my DVD-ROM drive in the future (it apparently doesn't read CD's and DVD's very well anymore), but my working burner is good enough for me at the moment. The burner can also read most CD's and DVD's, so the need for a new DVD-ROM drive is not that urgent. :)
Everything is now finally up and running again (I've had to re-install many programmes) and I'm glad that I'm able to use my computer again. Hopefully no new problems will occur, because a computer repairman is always rather expensive. :-/
Well, that's it for now, I suppose. :) I'm tired now and I want to go to bed, so I'm gonna go - but not before posting a few nice memes (somewhat related to Valentine's Day, to add a little bit to the spirit). ;)
ESTJ-The Supervisor
You scored 75 I versus E, 80 N versus S, 80 F versus T, and 60 J versus P!
Your ideal partner is known as the supervisor. As a romantic partner, this type communicates very clearly their strong opinions so their partners always know where they stand. They are dependable, responsible, and rock solid. They can be rather inflexible about giving up any control and insist on keeping a schedule, although they have great energy and enthusiasm for planned adventures. They have difficulty seeing others' points of view and their biggest downfall in a relationship is dismissing their partner's feelings as illogical. They feel most appreciated for being trustworthy, efficient, and productive. They wish to be thanked tangibly for the ways they keep your lives on track.
The group summary: Guardians (SJ)
The Type Summary: ESTJ
My test tracked 4 variables. How you compared to other people your age and gender: | You scored higher than 68% on I versus E | | You scored higher than 90% on N versus S | | You scored higher than 85% on F versus T | | You scored higher than 35% on J versus P |
|
Link: The Best Personality Type for You Test written by unpretentious2 on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test| Your Five Variable Love Profile |
 Propensity for Monogamy:
Your propensity for monogamy is high. You find it easy to be devoted and loyal to one person. And in return, you expect the same from who you love. Any sign of straying, and you'll end things.
Experience Level:
Your experience level is medium. You probably have had a couple significant loves. And you may have even had your heart broken. But you haven't really dated a wide variety of people.
Dominance:
Your dominance is low. This doesn't mean you're a doormat, just balanced. You know a relationship is not about getting your way. And you love to give your sweetie a lot of freedom.
Cynicism:
Your cynicism is high. Sure you believe in love, but you know it doesn't come easily. You scoff at "love at first sight" and "soulmates." You rather take the real thing, as unglamorous as it is.
Independence:
Your independence is medium. In relationships, you need both "me time" and "we time." You usually find it easy to be part of a couple. But occasionally you start to feel a little smothered. |
ISTJ - The Inspector
You scored 0% I to E, 52% N to S, 52% F to T, and 26% J to P!
Your type is known as the inspector, and the single word that describes you is superdependable. You also belong to the larger group of guardians. You look carefully at the people and institutions around you and notice every last detail. You feel it is up to you to make sure those around you uphold certain standards of attitude and conduct. You are down-to-earth, with a distaste for fanciful things. You prefer things practical to new-fangled. Your word is your bond. You have no problem with detail. You share your type with 10% of the population.
As a romantic partner, you are dependable and predictable. You usually like things done in very specific ways. You tend to appreciate tradition, and you work hard to achieve goals. You have trouble sharing your feelings, though. In your eagerness to be organized and productive, you can also be unwilling to examine or embrace alternative points of view. You like to be appreciated for your practical contributions, your common sense, and the efforts you make to keep your life on track. You like to be thanked often, both informally and formally and are most likely to be upset when your partner forgets a tradition you hold dear, such as an anniversary.
Your group summary: Guardians (SJ)
Your Type Summary: ISTJ
My test tracked 4 variables. How you compared to other people your age and gender: | You scored higher than 0% on I to E | | You scored higher than 68% on N to S | | You scored higher than 55% on F to T | | You scored higher than 13% on J to P |
|
Link: The LONG Scientific Personality Test written by unpretentious2 on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test| You Go For Brains! |
 You want a guy with a big... brain. And of course it would be nice if he were a total hottie, but you're not counting on it. What's on the inside is what counts for you. (Besides, you can always change the outside later!) |